More IPs found in hacking probe, but they might mean nothing
Investigators looking into last week’s cyber attack on South Korean banks and broadcasters have reportedly found more IP (Internet Protocol) addresses linked to the attacks, but one security expert I spoke to said that might mean nothing.
The National Police Agency said it has traced some of the malicious code to addresses in the United States and three European countries, according to Yonhap. No further details were released by the NPA.
The news comes after investigators last week publicly announced a Chinese address as linked to the attack, but then withdrew the accusation a day later. It turned out the address was correct and, when used on the global Internet it was located in a China, but in the context of this attack was being reused by Nonghyup Bank on its internal network.
The attacks hit at 2pm on March 20 and resulted in an estimated 32,000 machines at three broadcasters, KBS, MBC and YTN, and three banks, Kookmin Bank, Nonghyup Bank and Jeju Bank, being hit. The contents of the hard disk drive on many of the machines was wiped clean.
Part of the investigation is centered on discovering the source — especially a smoking-gun link to many people’s favorite suspect: North Korea — but it’s so far come up empty.
That’s because tracing the source of a cyber attack is really difficult, if not impossible, said Brian Laing, vice president of marketing and business development, at AhnLab’s office in Silicon Valley.
“It varies depending on the level of attacker,” said Laing, who said he has been involved in the technical side of cyber security since the 1990s.
Sometimes the IP address can directly locate a hacker, said Laing. He once found a hacker based at a university computer lab thanks to the address, but only because the hacker was directly accessing the server without routing his traffic through other machines or using obfuscation techniques. In that case, he was able to determine the precise terminal in the lab that was being used.
Often though today, it’s much tougher.
“Most of the time, people are going through a network of owned machines or they are bouncing [their data traffic] off various proxies and in and out of the Tor network, so it can be very difficult to ultimately trace it back to an IP address,” he said.
Proxy servers work as intermediate relays for traffic while the Tor network is a global system for anonymizing traffic. Tor makes it all-but impossible to discover the ultimate source of an attack.
The highly anonymous nature of Tor makes it popular with dissidents and people in authoritarian countries, but it’s also popular with hackers and those involved in illegal activities.
Laing said it doesn’t take a state-sponsored hacker to execute an anonymous attack these days. Often the software involved can be downloaded from hacker web sites.
“You’ve got multiple stories of kids downloading various botnet access, infecting small numbers of machines and then infecting other networks. You don’t even need an organization behind you,” said Laing.
So chasing IP addresses, if the attackers are clever, could be an exercise in futility.
But there are other ways to identify a hacker, or at least get an idea of who they are.
“You break down the code and see certain things in the code that tie back to the individual,” he said.
The software code will sometimes provide clues such as snippets of a certain language, styles of writing code or pieces reused from other attacks. All of those can help build up a profile of the author.
The increasing number of anonymous attacks and those launched for financial gain marks a big change in the threat landscape.
“I liken it to graffiti,” he said.
“Graffiti started and still is an art form, but it has devolved into people tagging their names wherever they can. Cyber attacking is the opposite. It was people blasting things out and defacing websites to gain standing and recognition, but now attackers are lying in wait and trying to remain undetected.”
|Print article||This entry was posted by Martyn Williams on March 26, 2013 at 07:21, and is filed under Hacking, Security. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.|
No comments yet.
No trackbacks yet.
about 1 year ago - No comments
The mysterious cyber attack that hit an estimated 32,000 computers at South Korean TV stations and banks last week is looking more interesting, based on the latest analysis from computer security companies. The first immediate analysis concluded that the malicious software was pretty unsophisticated, in part because it was based on a piece of malware that…
about 1 year ago - 6 comments
A cyber attack on three of South Korea’s major broadcasters and several of its major banks appears to have been caused by a relatively unsophisticated piece of software, security researchers said Wednesday. [Story updated, see below] The attacks, which began at around 2pm local time on Wednesday (5:00 UTC) left desktop and laptop computers unable…
about 3 years ago - 1 comment
South Korea’s National Police Agency says North Korea was behind cyber attacks that targeted 30 major websites between March 3 and 5, according to local news reports. Websites such as the presidential office and Financial Services Commission were brought down by the distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. A DDoS attack involves flooding a server…