By: Tony Rayo

Tony Rayo — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:02:24 +0000

Anonymous defiantly uses the “shotgun spray approach” when it comes to hacking (while some legitimate hackers may have existed or do exist within Anonymous, as we’ve seen from other attacks, the most commonly used tools are ones that can be downloaded for free from the internet and are often written by security experts). The reason there are so many “ops” in Anonymous is due purely based on the vast number of servers in existence. It’s not hard to find vulnerable computers with detailed and sometimes secret information on them when many of the places hit have small, overworked IT departments (or regular employees playing the role of one).

Also I don’t see the benefit or really even the challenge of taking down .kr websites, there aren’t even that many in existence that are publicly accessible. The “evil Zionist American Government” is considering reopening trade with Cuba, why not take out all *.gov.cu servers, after you hack into their servers and steal all of their military secrets of course. The biggest stick Anonymous has at this point probably include a few users with access to sizable botnets.

By: Frank Feinstein

Frank Feinstein — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 07:59:08 +0000

Anonymous has been long on hyperbole and short on hard evidence. If they’ve done what they claim to have done there are a myriad ways to provide evidence of their feat. Personally, I’ll believe it when I see it.

I’ve watched KCNA for some time now, and the fact they issued this statement could lend a fraction more credibility to Anonymous, in my opinion. This was an unwise move by North Korea, as you said, if they didn’t have Anonymous’s attention they do now.

Comments on: KCNA hits back at Anonymous

By: Tony Rayo

By: Frank Feinstein