More on UN meeting, silencing of DPRK microphone

A North Korean diplomat speaks at a human rights event at the United Nations on April 30, 2015.

I now have the full video of the incident on Thursday at the United Nations when a North Korean diplomat interrupted a discussion on human rights.

It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad.

At the meeting, the diplomat began speaking just after a defector ended his speech and without being recognized by the chair, journalist Barbara Demick. After giving him a few moments to speak, Demick asked them to reserve their comments for the question and answer period, but they continued.

You can see the whole thing here.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Samantha Power, told the North Korean delegation it would be able to speak once the panel had concluded, but the North Koreans pressed on.

“I think the audience will agree that it’s better to allow the DPRK to speak as it’s a self-discrediting exercise and we will resume our panel,” said Power. “Conclude your statement and we will go back to our panel.”

It’s at that point that things started getting more out of panel.

Others in the room started shouting at the North Koreans in Korean and then the microphone in front of the diplomat went live, amplifying his words.

“Please shut the mic down since this is not an authorized presentation,” said Power. “If we could ask the acoustic people. Please ensure that the microphone is not live.”

After indulging the diplomat for three and a half minutes, people were starting to get out of their chairs, speak to the North Koreans and take photos.

Then, after just under four minutes, Powers announced U.N. security was being called.

“Sir, you can either conclude your remarks or you will removed from the room,” she said.

But the diplomat continued and the panel continued to show remarkable tolerance, looking more bemused than anything else.

Six and a half minutes later, the speech was over and the event went on.

When you spend a lot of time talking about freedom of speech, it’s perhaps inevitable that questions are asked when you order microphones to be shut off.

Later in the day at the U.N.’s daily briefing, Matthew Lee, a resident U.N. reporter, asked the organization about the decision to switch the microphone off.

At the time, the spokesman said he wasn’t aware of what happened, but on Friday distanced the United Nations from the decision saying it wasn’t an official event.

It was organized by the U.S. and South Korean missions.

3 Comments on "More on UN meeting, silencing of DPRK microphone"

  1. Shame on US! Only US has the right to speak, only the speaches working for US can be allowed. It’s US style freedom.
    These defectors said their family members were executed or they were political prisoners, but the fact is most of them were criminals.
    The famous defector Sin Tong Hyok said his father was a political prisoner, his mother and brother were excuted as they tried to defect. An interview on his father showed the truth. His father was not a political prisoner, but a band member and worked in Russia for 5 years. His mother was a broadcaster, she sentenced to death as killed a women with his elder son. Sin Tong Hyok defected after raped a underage schoolgirl.

    The interviewes on these defectors’ families

  2. It’s a Kim Jong-Illibuster!

  3. The North Koreans are a silly bunch. When I want a good laugh I tune to the best comedy radio station around. Voice of Korea.

    To quote a friend who works for the Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing. North Korea makes Cultural Revolution in China look like a democracy.

Comments are closed.

An affiliate of 38 North